Interesting. Your profile alludes to Heidegger, yet your terminology suggests an analytic predisposition or affiliation. Perhaps this is what led you astray.

The presence of simultaneous contradictory T-attitudes doesn't imply anything except that humans are fundamentally irrational, a proposition which enjoys widespread empirical confirmation. It's conceivable that me-as-Kate can very well hold a favorable opinion about LOTR, while me-as-not-Kate holds a quite opposite opinion.
4
And I also don't understand your negative attitude toward statistics. Next thing you'll be trying to convince me that science journalism is untrustworthy, which is a dangerous way of thinking to promote because how would we have civilization without it? How would people know e.g. whether women really are more predisposed to own cats, or [… something about nutrition…]